Comparison between DAB, DAB+ and IP in terms of audio quality for mobile users

Brief summary

Best overall audio quality on mobile (when you have reasonable data/WiFi): IP (Opus/AAC) - most efficient, highest perceived quality, adaptive.

Best in places where cellular data is poor but broadcast coverage exists: DAB+ - efficient broadcast codec (HE-AAC), strong SFN coverage, lower battery on devices with a receiver.

Least efficient/oldest technology: DAB (MP2) - requires much higher bit rates for similar music quality.

Below I compare them according to the factors that interest mobile listeners


factor DAB (MP2) DAB+ (HE-AAC / AAC+) IP (Opus / AAC / MP3, adaptive)
Typical codec MPEG-1 Layer II (MP2) HE-AAC (AAC+ / AAC v2) Opus / AAC / Others
Typical bitrate for music broadcasts 128–192 kbps 48–128 kbps 32–256 kbps (adaptive)
Perceived quality of speech Good at low-medium kbps Very good at low kbps Excellent (Opus is very effective)
Perceived quality of music OK at 128 kbps, need more kbps Very good at 64–96 kbps Best (Opus/AAC at 96–128 kbps competes with or better than DAB)
Mobility resistance Good (COFDM, SFN) Like DAB Cellular coverage; capable of buffering and self-adjusting
Deception in reception while moving Low if the cliché is good same High chance of areas with absorption gaps, buffering helps overcome this phenomenon
Latency Redundancy Very low Very low Higher (buffer-dependent)
Cell phone battery usage Low (if the tuner is in firmware) Low (if the tuner is in firmware) High (cellular/Wi-Fi active)
Data / Cost free free By the cost of mobile data service
Additional features Disability Disability Richness (metadata, artwork, graphics, albums, on-demand content)

Key technical points

Basic explanation:

Codec efficiency: MP2 used by classic DAB is much less efficient than HE-AAC (+DAB) and modern streaming codecs. This means that MP2 needs a significantly higher bitrate to sound as good. HE-AAC (+DAB) is a big step forward - better music/speech at a much lower bitrate. Opus (the modern internet codec) is even more efficient than HE-AAC in most mobile scenarios, especially at low bitrates and for mixed speech and music content.

Bitrate vs. perceived quality: On a phone with headphones, an Opus or AAC stream at ~96-128 kbps will generally give better, cleaner music than MP2 at 128-192 kbps. DAB+ can sound very close to IP at similar bitrates due to HE-AAC efficiency.

Mobility and resilience: DAB/DAB+ uses transponder modulation (COFDM) and often single frequency networks (SFN) - this provides consistent coverage in well-planned areas and low latency. IP streaming is dependent on the cellular link: if you go through a coverage gap or change cells, you may see buffering or short interruptions; good ABR (adaptive bit rate) and small client buffers reduce quality degradation but add latency.

Latency: Broadcast (DAB/+DAB) has almost instant start and minimal delay (good for live events). IP typically uses buffers of a few seconds (start delay 2-10+ seconds) for smooth playback; can be configured for lower latency at the cost of more drops.

Battery and hardware: If a device has a dedicated DAB tuner, it usually uses less power than continuous cellular streaming. Most smartphones don't come with DAB tuners, so IP is usually the only practical option.

Cost and network availability: DAB/DAB+ is free once you have the receiver. IP uses data - a major concern for users on metered plans or weak networks.

Practical recommendations for mobile users

Disclaimer: The articles published on this website represent the personal opinions of the authors. Some content may include summaries of information gathered from various sources across the internet. While we strive for accuracy, the information is provided for general informational purposes only.